Surgery Coding Challenge: Keep Flaps Straight for Proper Code Selection
Posted on 05. Apr, 2010 by Editor in Coding Challenge, Hot Coding Topics
Discover why coding a myofascial flap twice is a big mistake.
Question: Our surgeon performs an abdominal closure using left and right myofascial advancement flaps. I believe we should code one unit of 15734 because flap codes refer to the recipient area — not donor site. But the surgeon believes we should code 15734 x 2 because he uses two flaps to perform the defect closure. What is the correct coding?
Arkansas Subscriber
Answer: You should not report 15734 (Muscle, myocutaneous, or fasciocutaneous flap; trunk) for this service — either once or twice. Instead, you should list the procedure using an adjacent tissue transfer code such as 14000 (Adjacent tissue transfer or rearrangement, trunk; defect 10 sq cm or less) or 14001 (… defect 10.1 sq cm to 30.0 sq cm) depending on the defect size.
Here’s why: Adjacent tissue transfer rearrangement includes repair by advancement flaps, according to CPT instruction in the introduction to those codes. On the other hand, 15734 does not specifically include myofascial flaps and does not describe advancement flaps for closure.
Size matters: Rather than coding this twice, you should code the entire size of the primary and secondary defects (including secondary defects for both flaps). If the defect is larger than 30.0 cm, you can still use the adjacent tissue transfer or rearrangement codes by listing 14301 (Adjacent tissue transfer or rearrangement, any area; defect 30.1 sq cm to 60.0 sq cm) and adding +14302 (… each additional 30.0 sq cm, or part therof [list separately in addition to code for primary procedure]) as needed.
@ General Surgery Coding Alert
Be a hero. Join the medical coding community at Supercoder.com and get the latest updates at the Supercoder Facebook fan page.
- Free updates on CPT, ICD-9, HCPCS, Medicare, NCCI edits, and ICD-10.
- Discounts on 3rd party offers
Loading ...Visit SuperCoder For:
