Archive for 'Hot Coding Topics'

Collections: Banish Co-pay, A/R Problems

Posted on 07. Feb, 2010 by Editor.

0

5 tips help you recover deserved pay.

Collecting money from patients, especially during a recession, can be challenging. If your front desk is responsible for collecting copays and sometimes old balances, its success or failure has a dramatic impact on the practice’s bottom line.

Check out five ways you can improve your front desk collection efforts:

1. When calling to remind patients about their visit date, also remind them of their co-pay amount and any old balances so they come prepared to pay at the visit.

2. When a patient complains about paying a bill, send her to a manager so the bill can be reviewed and explained.

3. Most practice management software will allow front desk staff to view outstanding balances. Your front desk staff can politely remind the patient that there is a balance and say something like, “How would you like to pay your bill today?” Assume that the patient is planning to pay. (more…)

Continue Reading

Newborn Status Change Means Deciding Between Hospital Care Codes

Posted on 04. Feb, 2010 by suzanne.leder.

0

Sort your normal, sick and intensive care options.

Choosing the appropriate codes for initial newborn services can be difficult due to the large number of available codes and gray areas between the spectrum of illnesses. If you find yourself getting tripped up by the multiple categories, read on for expert tips and real-world examples that will point you in the right direction every time.

Normal Care Means No Problems

A “normal” newborn has no medical conditions or need for special care. Report the history and examination with 99460 (Initial hospital or birthing center care, per day, for evaluation and management of normal newborn infant).

Donelle Holle, RN, a consultant with Pedscoding.com in Indiana says this initial care includes five things: (more…)

Continue Reading

Oncology Coding 2010 Update: 3 New Lab Services Codes

Posted on 02. Feb, 2010 by Editor.

0

Watch for your chance to replace 86316 with more specific 86305.

If your oncology practice has its own lab, heads up.

You’re sure to find a few new lab codes “in CPT 2010 that you need to know,” says Peggy Slagle, CPC, billing compliance coordinator at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha.

Get started with a look at these three codes you’re likely to use in your oncology/hematology practice.

Heed New HE4 Code, 86305 … (more…)

Continue Reading

What Lab Coders Need to Know About CCI 16.0

Posted on 31. Jan, 2010 by Editor.

0

Look for transcutaneous hemoglobin limitations, and bundling for those new 2010 culture codes.

Think you’re ready to use all those brand new CPT lab codes? Not so fast. You better learn Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) restrictions first, before you start billing Medicare for services using new CPT 2010 codes.

CCI released version 16.0, effective Jan. 1, which includes 24,060 new active pairs and 869 modifier changes, according to Frank D. Cohen, MPA, MBB, senior analyst with MIT Solutions.

Let our experts walk you through the edits that could make billing for some code pairings difficult for your lab.

Block Out Transcutaneous Hemoglobin

CPT 2010 provides a new code for in situ hemoglobin testing: 88738 (Hemoglobin [Hgb], quantitative, transcutaneous). But according to the latest CCI edits, you can never bill 88738 for a patient on the same day that the lab performs any of the following “mutually exclusive” tests:

• 85013 — Blood count; spun microhematocrit

• 85014 —… hematocrit (Hct)

• 85018 —… hemoglobin (Hgb)

• 88740 — Hemoglobin, quantitative, transcutaneous, per day; carboxyhemoglobin

• 88741 —… methemoglobin.

“Because CCI 16.0 lists these bundled codes with a modifier indicator of ‘0,’ you can’t override the edit pair under any circumstances,” says William Dettwyler, MTAMT, president of Codus Medicus, a laboratory coding consulting firm in Salem, Ore.

Beware CBC bundles: CCI 16.0 also bundles 88738 as a component (column 2) code of the following blood count codes:

• 85025 — Blood count; complete (CBC), automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC, and platelet count) and automated differential WBC count

• 85027 —… complete (CBC), automated (Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC, and platelet count).

Since CCI assigns a modifier indicator of “0” to these pairs as well, you won’t ever be able to break the bundles

Problem: Your lab might get requests for two medically necessary hemoglobin tests by different methods in a single day. Based on these new CCI edits, the lab would not be able to bill for both procedures. “For instance, the lab might perform a complete blood count (CBC, such as 85025) for an infant, and based on a low hemoglobin count, perform a transcutaneous hemoglobin later in the day,” Dettwyler says. “With these edit pairs in place, the lab could not bill both procedures.”

Pick 1 Culture Typing Procedure

Your lab might also be ready to use these new CPT 2010 codes for culture typing:

• 87150 — Culture, typing; identification by nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), probe, amplified probe technique, per culture or isolate, each organism probed • 87153 -Culture, typing: identification by nucleic acid sequencing method, each isolate (e.g., sequencing of the 16SrRNA gene).

Watch out: CCI 16.0 places many restrictions on how you can use these codes. Based on the latest edit pairs, you would not expect to report 87150 or 87153 with any other culture typing procedure described by the following codes:

• 87140 — Culture, typing; immunofluorescent method, each antiserum

• 87143 —… gas liquid chromatography (GLC) or high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method

• 87147 —… immunologic method, other than immunofluoresence (e.g., agglutination grouping), per antiserum

• 87152 —… identification by pulse field gel typing

• 87158 —… other methods.

Capture distinct isolates: Although your lab would only use one culture typing technique on a single culture, the lab might perform typing on multiple isolates in a single day. “Labs often process more than one culture from a patient on a single day, such as identifying multiple isolates from a wound culture,” Dettwyler says. When that happens, you might need to report two culture typing methods, such as 87150 and 87140. Because CCI lists these edit pairs with a modifier indicator of “1,” you can override the edit pair by appending modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) to the column 2 code (87150).

Avoid Method ‘Double Dipping’

If your lab performs an infectious agent antigen detection test using nucleic acid probes (87470-87799, Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid [DNA or RNA] …) you can’t additionally report the new nucleic acid culture typing codes (87150-87153) to describe the lab method, according to CCI 16.0.

“The bundling is common sense,” Dettwyler explains. “87470-87799 describe nucleic acid probes for direct specimens while 87150 and 87153 describe nucleic acid methods for cultures.” The new CCI bundles ensure that you don’t “double dip” these code pairs.

Hurdle: Your lab might process two distinct specimens for the same patient on the same day and legitimately need to report two of the bundled codes. “For example, the lab might process a positive Chlamydia culture (87110, Culture, Chlamydia, any source) by performing a culture typing test such as 87150, and also process a direct smear for gonorrhea on the same day (such as 87591, Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid[DNA or RNA]; Neisseria gonorrhoeae, amplified probe technique),” Dettwyler says.

“Labs need to be alert to this type of bundling restriction and make sure to use modifier 59 to override the edit pair when the lab legitimately performs two bundled tests on two separate pecimens,” he advises.

Watch for molecular diagnostics method bundles:

CCI 16.0 adds a long list of edit pairs to ensure that you don’t list molecular diagnostics steps (from the range 83890-83913, Molecular diagnostics …) to describe procedures your lab follows while performing culture typing (87149-87153).

HLA crossmatch includes flow cytometry methods:

Following the same logic of bundling “method” codes into specific tests that use those methods, CCI 16.0 also adds several edit pairs for the following new HLA crossmatch codes:

• 86825 — Human leukocyte antigen [HLA] crossmatch, non-cytotoxic (e.g., using flow cytometry); first serum sample or dilution

• +86826 —… each additional serum sample or sample dilution (List separately in addition to primary procedure).

The edit pairs bundle 86825 and +86826 with each of the flow cytometry codes 88184-88189. “Labs perform the HLA crossmatch using flow cytometry methods, but you shouldn’t separately report the flow codes because 86825 +86826 are all-inclusive,” Dettwyler says. CCI 16.0 also bundles the HLA codes with B cell (86355) and T cell (86359), because you would not ordinarily quantify B and T cells in addition to an HLAcrossmatch.

Choose 1 Method for pH

CCI 16.0 creates edit pairs for new CPT 2010 code 83987 (pH; exhaled breath condensate). According to the edits, you shouldn’t list 83987 with blood pH (82800), other body fluid pH (83986), or expired gases (94250).

“CCI lists these edit pairs with a modifier indicator of ‘1,’ so you can override the edit pair if the lab performs more than one of these tests on separate specimens on the same day,” Dettwyler says.

© Pathology/Lab Coding Alert. Download 2 sample issues here.

AUDIO: 2010 update for lab & path coders. With Peggy Slagle.

Continue Reading

Orthopedic Coding Clinic: Labral Tears

Posted on 28. Jan, 2010 by Editor.

1

10-2:00 in the op note signals SLAP lesion repair.

Even experts can land on the wrong ICD-9 code for SLAP lesion repair, but visualizing the injury region as a clock will help you distinguish one type of SLAP (superior labral anterior posterior) tear from another.

Research Patient History for Accurate Diagnosis

Having a solid understanding of anatomy and knowing the severity of the patient’s situation give your coding a firm foundation.

Define it: The labrum is the rim of cartilage that deepens the shoulder socket (glenoid) and increases joint stability. The superior portion of the labrum can be torn when the shoulder dislocates forwardly (anteriorly). This results in a SLAP lesion — a tear of the superior labrum, anterior to posterior, says William J. Mallon, MD, an orthopedic surgeon and medical director of Triangle Orthopaedic Associates in Durham, N.C.

Patients can acquire a SLAP lesion after falling down, or following repeated overhead actions such as throwing a football. Symptoms include pain, swelling, and an occasional “clicking” sound when moving the arm in a throwing position. (more…)

Continue Reading

Audits: HDI RAC Targets TC, Modifier 26 & More

Posted on 26. Jan, 2010 by Editor.

0

Want to know what RAC contractors will be looking for next? Here’s the link.

Recovery audit contractors (RACs) are working hard to expand their lists of approved issues, and you should keep a close eye on your services in these areas as well.

Health Data Insights (HDI), the RAC contractor for Region D, posted 66 new approved issues for review in January, with the following just a small sample of what HDI plans to review going forward:

• Global surgery pay versus technical component (TC)/professional component (modifier 26) and

• New patient versus established patient cases.

Keep in mind: When a RAC lists its open issues, it also lists the applicable states where it is reviewing them. Some issues are under review for all states that fall into a particular RAC’s purview, while others may be applicable to just one or two states.

Bottom line: To stay on top of the issues that your RAC is reviewing, check in on the applicable Web site from time to time.

To learn more about what the RACs are doing in YOUR region, go here.

© Part B Insider. Download your 2 FREE sample issues here.

If you think the RACs are the only auditors you need to worry about, think again. Meet the MICs.

Continue Reading

Ob-Gyn CCI 16.0: Hysterectomy Coding

Posted on 22. Jan, 2010 by suzanne.leder.

0

Here’s where you can bypass the edits with modifier 59.

The Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) version 16.0 didn’t overlook the hysterectomy, vaginal graft, and colpopexy codes — nor should you. To make sense of the deletions, break these additions into mutually exclusive and non-mutually exclusive.

Note: In all these cases — except those involving the anesthetic injection codes, you can bypass the edits with a modifier (such as 59, Distinct procedural services). You must have documentation to support the modifier’s use.

Cross Out This Hysterectomy Bundle

CMS deleted the non-mutually exclusive bundle of 58292 (Vaginal hysterectomy, for uterus greater than 250 g; with removal of tube[s] and/or ovary[s], with repair of enterocele) as the column 2 code to 58294 (… with repair of enterocele), but then re-added it in reverse order. (more…)

Continue Reading

Wound Closure Coding: Make the Simple, Intermediate Distinction

Posted on 21. Jan, 2010 by suzanne.leder.

0

Accounting for depth is a tricky task when coding closure.

Practices interested in ethically boosting their bottom line and getting $80 or more for the same closure repair need to walk the line that separates simple from intermediate.

What Makes a Repair “Simple”?

A wound closure is a simple repair if the procedure:

  • is simple;
  • is a single-layer closure involving the epidermis, dermis, or subcutaneous tissues; and
  • does not involve deeper structures.

Code these closures with 12001-12021, confirms Dilsia Santiago, CCS, CCS-P, a coder in Reading, Pa. And remember that simple repair includes “local anesthesia, and chemical or electrocauterization of wounds not closed,” she continues.

Example: The ED physician examines a 22-year-old patient’s scalp wound … (more…)

Continue Reading

Second Surgery Coding: Tips for Modifier 58, 78 Success

Posted on 19. Jan, 2010 by sanjay.aikat.

1

Don’t let ‘unplanned’ lead to ‘unpaid.’

The next time a patient takes an extra trip to the operating room, don’t let the added service throw your coding off track. Keep these tips in mind to know when to assign modifier 78 – or something else.

Check for Surprise Versus Planned

Two modifiers pertain to follow-up trips to the OR, but knowing the basic difference helps you choose the right one:

• Modifier 58 (Staged or related procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period) represents an expected return to the OR. This could be because the original surgery normally is performed during multiple sessions or the follow-up is more extensive than the original procedure. “The patient’s condition dictates the additional service or the service was planned prior to the original surgery,” explains Linda Parks, office manager for Herrin Family Medicine in Lilburn, Ga. You can also report modifier 58 for non-OR sessions, such as planned therapy following surgery. (more…)

Continue Reading

Pathology Billing: Calculate How MUE/CCI Restricts Your Outside Consult Pay

Posted on 17. Jan, 2010 by Editor.

0

Don’t bank on accepted 88321-88323 unit of service.

Your pathologist consults with an outside lab on slides taken from a 2006 lumpectomy and a 2009 lymph node fine needle aspiration (FNA). That’s 88321 x 2 — right?

Maybe. Your payer determines the answer to that question.

The problem: “Although the American Medical Association (AMA) says the unit of service for pathology consultation codes 88321-88325 is ‘each case,’ CMS begs to differ,” says Dennis Padget, MBA, CPA, FHFMA, president of DLPadget Enterprises Inc., publisher of the Pathology Service Coding Handbook, in The Villages, Fla.

Distinguish CPT Rules

CPT provides three codes for pathology consultations on material referred from an outside institution:

• 88321 — Consultation and report on referred slides prepared elsewhere (more…)

Continue Reading

Radiology Coding: CPT 2010 Breathes New Life Into Your Respiratory Coding

Posted on 14. Jan, 2010 by Editor.

0

Master 32561’s guidelines to prevent a major units gaffe.

Flip through the Surgery/Respiratory System section of your CPT 2010 manual, and you’ll see the coding committee has been hard at work adding to and revising your options. Discover the added cath removal code, the all new fibrinolytic agent instillation code, and the reshaped bronchoscopy descriptors, so you can rest assured your coding will be ship-shape in 2010.

1. End Your Hunt for 32550’s Removal Code Match

Until now, CPT has offered insertion code 32550 (Insertion of indwelling tunneled pleural catheter with cuff), but you’ve been left in the lurch for removal, using either an E/M or unlisted code.

CPT 2010 adds new code 32552 (Removal of indwelling tunneled pleural catheter with cuff) to solve this problem, said Stephen Hoffman, MD, associate professor of clinical medicine at Ohio State University Medical Center in Columbus and AMA CPT Advisory Committee American Thoracic Society representative, at AMA’s 2010 annual CPT and RBRVS symposium.

Tube trivia: “Initially, when code 32550 was created, an indwelling tunneled pleural catheter with cuff was inserted for drainage and management of malignant pleural effusions at the end of a patient’s life; therefore, the removal of the catheter was not included in the valuation of 32550,” according to The ACR’s Radiology Coding Source (Sept./Oct. 2009).

Code 32552 now covers the incisions and “subcutaneous dissection of the indwelling cuff” needed to remove the catheter, ACR explains.

Next, watch out for the coding pitfall … (more…)

Continue Reading

CMS’s Refusal to Pay Consults Makes MSP Claims a Headache

Posted on 12. Jan, 2010 by Editor.

5

If you bill consults to private payers, good luck collecting the balance from Medicare secondary payers.

Don’t even think about billing a consult to Medicare — even if it’s only a secondary payer claim. Medicare may have scratched consultations off of its list of payable services, but many other insurers did not follow suit. This leaves you in a quandary when your physician performs a consult and the primary insurer pays you for it, but Medicare is the secondary payer.

“Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) will not pay for consults,” says Samantha Daily, billing specialist with Urologic Consultants, PC in Portland, Ore. She points coders toward MLN Matters article MM6740, which indicates the following:

“In MSP cases, physicians and others must bill an appropriate E/M code for the services previously paid using the consultation codes. If the primary payer for the service continues to recognize consultation codes,” you should bill in one of the following two ways: (more…)

Continue Reading

PQRI 2010: Tips That Boost Your Practice’s Revenue

Posted on 10. Jan, 2010 by Editor.

0

Follow our links and advice to put more plusses in your claims column

Back again for 2010 is Medicare’s incentive-driven physician quality reporting initiative (PQRI), aimed at tracking quality metric or patient care services that physicians provide. When the practice treats enough patients in the same category, some PQRI dollars might be only a few codes away.

If you know the basics and focus your efforts, PQRI reporting can be a breeze and a boon to your bottom line. Check out this rundown on “The Whats?” of PQRI.

What’s In it for Me?

Coders can garner an extra payout for PQRI-eligible patients that your group treats and you code correctly; for 2010, Medicare will fork over a 2 percent bonus if you meet certain criteria.

Lowdown: In order to qualify for the PRQI bonus, you have to report on at least three of 179 PQRI measures in 80 percent of the eligible cases, explains Alice Marie Reybitz, RN, BA, CPC, CPC-H, CHI, a healthcare coding and billing consultant based in Belleair, Fla.

What Extra Coding Work Is Involved? (more…)

Continue Reading

Global Billing: Document ‘Unrelated’ for Modifier 79 Services

Posted on 07. Jan, 2010 by Editor.

1

MACs are looking for ‘red flags’ to halt additional global period pay

Billing for additional services during a global surgery period is always tricky, but now you can expect special scrutiny for modifier 79 claims.

After the OIG got wind of fraudulent surgery billing with modifier 79 (Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period), CMS contractors have been on the hunt for modifier 79 abuse. Implement our expert tips below to keep your 79 claims clean.

Obey Global Package Model

The starting point for clean modifier 79 claims is not breaching the global surgical billing concept. Once you understand the global package rules, you’ll know when you have an exception that warrants an additional claim with an appropriate modifier. (more…)

Continue Reading

CPT 2010 Update: Urogynecology Coding

Posted on 05. Jan, 2010 by Editor.

1

Remember, supervision requirements still apply to new codes.

CPT 2010 brings some big changes to urogynecology coding. Your urodynamics coding — and income — changes drastically as of Jan. 1.

Get to Know These 3 New Complex Cystometrogram Codes

You will have three new urodynamics codes to learn starting Jan. 1. CPT 2010 adds the following codes:

• 51727 — Complex cystometrogram (ie, calibrated electronic equipment); with urethral pressure profile studies (ie, urethral closure pressure profile), any technique. (more…)

Continue Reading

2010 CPT General Surgery Coding Update: Changes for Lap, Abdominal Repair & Hemorrhoidectomy

Posted on 30. Dec, 2009 by Editor.

1

Can you find codes in 2010’s resequencing mess? We show you how.

Reporting your general surgeon’s service with an unlisted code means more documentation work and a payment guessing game — that’s why you’ll welcome CPT 2010’s more specific codes.

General surgery can get all the details at this on-demand, specialty-specific audio update. But we won’t keep you in complete suspense. Here’s a peek at what you’ll learn in the audio.

Capture Large Abdominal Repairs With New Code

When your general surgeon repairs a large abdominal wall defect, you didn’t have a way to report the work — until now. (more…)

Continue Reading

Ask 3 Questions to Head Off 2010 Consult Problems Before They Start

Posted on 17. Dec, 2009 by Editor.

5

Ever used an unlisted E/M code? Get ready.

By now, you’ve heard that CMS is doing away with all inpatient (99251-99255) and outpatient (99241- 99245) consultation codes in 2010 — but are you prepared for the issues this may cause, starting Jan. 1? Ask these three questions of your practice and payers, and you’ll fend off headaches before they start.

Keep in mind: While Medicare has released the transmittal letter to all carriers instructing them about the policy change to no longer payer for consultations, Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) introduced an amendment to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590) to delay this policy change by one year. This amendment was added on Dec. 14, 2009.  If Congress does not pass this bill before the end of the year, the Medicare policy will go in as planned.  Check the Ob-gyn Coding Alert and SuperCoder for more developments, but be prepared just in case.

1. Do Medicaid and Private Payers Have Consult Advice?

If a physician sends a Medicare patient to your ob-gyn for a consultation, you should use regular E/M codes (99201-99215, Office of other outpatient visit for a new or established patient …) instead. But what about the other insurers? (more…)

Continue Reading

CCI 16.0: Now Allows a Modifier to Separate Hundreds of Edits

Posted on 15. Dec, 2009 by Editor.

1
Santa brings gifts; CCI brings bundles

Santa brings gifts; CCI brings bundles

But other new bundles that 16.0 has in store might put a dent in your reimbursement.

You may still be poring through your 2010 CPT manual, but the new edition of CCI, effective Jan. 1, is already looking to make some code pairings impossible.

The Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) released version 16.0 earlier this week, revealing 24,060 new active pairs and 869 modifier changes, said Frank D. Cohen, MPA, MBB, senior analyst with MIT Solutions, Inc., in a Dec. 8 announcement.

Good news: CCI version 16.0 attempts to untangle at least one troublesome set of edits in its next round with the announcement that effective Jan. 1, you’ll be able to use a modifier to separate the edits bundling E/M codes (99201-99215;99221-99223) into over 100 of the radiation oncology codes.

For instance, if you currently report new patient E/M code 99204 with 77261 (Therapeutic radiology treatment planning; simple), Medicare will deny the E/M code and no modifier can separate the edits. However, CCI 16.0 makes the modifier indicator for these bundles “1,” meaning you will be able to separate the edits with a modifier in some situations.

The bad news … (more…)

Continue Reading

CPT 2010: Add New AV Shunt Codes to Your Toolbox

Posted on 13. Dec, 2009 by Editor.

1

Initial vs. additional access matters in 2010.

Love them or hate them, the trend toward guidance-inclusive codes doesn’t seem to be slowing.

Case in point: CPT 2010 ousts 36145 (Introduction of needle or intracatheter; arteriovenous shunt created for dialysis [cannula, fistula, or graft]) and 75790 (Angiography, arteriovenous shunt [e.g., dialysis patient], radiological supervision and interpretation) and instead instructs you to consider the following new surgical codes — which include imaging:

• 36147 — Introduction of needle and/or catheter, arteriovenous shunt created for dialysis (graft/fistula); initial access with complete radiological evaluation of dialysis access, including fluoroscopy, image documentation and report (includes access of shunt, injection[s] of contrast, and all necessary imaging from the arterial anastomosis and adjacent artery through entire venous outflow including the inferior or superior vena cava) (more…)

Continue Reading

Podiatry Coding Clinic: G0245 and G0246

Posted on 10. Dec, 2009 by Editor.

4

Here’s when you may need to get an ABN

Medicare policies covering routine foot care for diabetic patients suffering from peripheral neuropathy with loss of protective sensation (LOPS) have been in force since 2002. Yet many still find the related G codes confusing. Today, let’s nail down the what documentation should be in the podiatrist’s note when you use G0245 or G0246.

First, let’s review CMS’s descriptors for these two codes:

• G0245 (Initial physician Evaluation and Management (E/M) of a diabetic patient with diabetic sensory neuropathy resulting in a loss of protective sensation (LOPS) …) — You’ll use this code when a patient sees your podiatrist for the first time. This G code represents routine foot care for patients who have adequate circulation and diabetes, but who also have a documented loss of sensation. (more…)

Continue Reading