Archive for 'Coding Challenge'
Gastroenterology Coding Challenge: Repositioning a G Tube
Posted on 07. Feb, 2010 by suzanne.leder.
Reading 44373’s code descriptor is key to getting your G Tube claim right.
Question: The gastroenterologist goes to the hospital to treat a patient that had recently been admitted because his gastrojejunostomy tube had migrated to his stomach. After performing a problem focused interval history and exam, the gastroenterologist decides to perform an EGD to reposition the tube. I cannot find a code for repositioning a G tube; how should I code this scenario?
Answer: Judging by your encounter description, the patient’s percutaneous jejunostomy tube (J tube) slipped and became a percutaneous gastrostomy tube (G tube). On the claim, report the following:
- 44373 (Small intestinal endoscopy, enteroscopy beyond second portion of duodenum, not including ileum; with conversion of percutaneousgastrostomy tube to a percutaneous jejunostomy tube) for the EGD; (more…)
Continue Reading
Why Is the Co-Pay I Collected Short By $20?
Posted on 06. Feb, 2010 by Editor.
Verify co-pay early to save time, money
Question: A patient came to our office for a routine exam with the same insurance card she’s had for years. We charged her the standard copay of record. Then I found out her employer changed the terms of the insurance, so the copay she paid was short by $20. What went wrong?
Answer: You might easily assume that when a patient has the same insurance company, the copay is the same as it has always been. But unless you check first, you won’t know the patient’s coverage has changed until after the fact.
Best practice … (more…)
Continue Reading
Is E/M Possible Pre-Colonoscopy?
Posted on 03. Feb, 2010 by Editor.
Question: A local family physician refers a patient to our gastroenterologist for a diagnostic colonoscopy. The patient reports to the practice and meets the gastroenterologist for the first time. After answering some patient questions during a brief introduction, the gastroenterologist performs a diagnostic colonoscopy with brushing. The patient had never met the gastroenterologist before. Is the time he spent with the patient pre-screening a separate E/M?
Answer: Do not report a separate E/M for this encounter. On the claim, report 45378 (Colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to splenic flexure; diagnostic, with or without collection of specimen[s] by brushing or washing, with or without colon decompression [separate procedure]) for the service.
Explanation … (more…)
Continue Reading
E/M Challenge: Can I Report 99214 and +99354?
Posted on 31. Jan, 2010 by suzanne.leder.
Counseling representing more than 50 percent of E/M visit? Choose level based on time.
Question: I have a family physician who documented 60 minutes on an established patient’s office visit. The FP diagnosed the patient with morbid obesity (278.01). Since the patient was newly diagnosed and had some difficulty understanding the doctor’s orders, the FP spent more than half the office visit time on counseling on therapeutic lifestyle changes and the treatment regimen. Should I code this as 99214 for the first 25 minutes and +99354 for the remaining time?
Answer: (more…)
Continue Reading
Surgery Coding Challenge: Master Microsurgery Units With This Advice
Posted on 28. Jan, 2010 by suzanne.leder.
Check your EOB to make sure payers don’t apply a multiple-procedure reduction to +69990.
Question: When my ENT uses a microscope during a procedure, what guidelines can I use for choosing between 92504 and +69990? Is there a rule governing how many times you can report the add-on code 69990?
Answer…
(more…)
Continue Reading
How Should I Code a Fibrinolytic Agent Instillation Via Chest Tube?
Posted on 28. Jan, 2010 by suzanne.leder.
Different calendar dates matter, but multiple instillations the same day do not.
Question: My pulmonologist inserted a chest tube and then instilled a fibrinolytic agent to break up multiloculations to free up an entrapped lung. Usually, I use 32560 for this procedure, which is for pleurodesis, not fibrinolysis. What code should I use for fibrinolytic agent instillation?
Answer: As of Jan. 1, you should be using one of two new fibrinolytic agent instillation codes depending on the treatment day:
• For instillation on the initial day, use 32561 (Instillation[ s], via chest tube/catheter, agent for fibrinolysis [e.g., fibrinolytic agent for breakup of multiloculated effusion]; initial day). (more…)
Continue Reading
Ophthalmology Coding Challenge: Flashers & Floaters
Posted on 24. Jan, 2010 by Editor.
How’s Your EO Coding & Billing? Test Yourself With This Scenario.
Question: A patient reports flashes and floaters but the ophthalmologist does not find evidence of retinal pathology on routine ophthalmoscopy. Are we justified in billing for extended ophthalmoscopy (EO)?
Answer: If the ophthalmoscopy is a routine part of a patient’s eye exam, do not bill for it separately. However, complaints of flashers and floaters are always serious and must be evaluated carefully; often, these symptoms will justify extended ophthalmoscopy (92225, Ophthalmoscopy, extended, with retinal drawing [e.g., for retinal detachment, melanoma], with interpretation and report; initial).
Use 92225 to report a Goldmann-3 exam (examining the retina with a three-mirror goniolens). Remember to keep your interpretation and report of the findings in the patient’s medical record. In many cases in which flashers and floaters are present, extended ophthalmoscopy (EO) combined with a retinal exam shows vitreous degeneration or posterior vitreous detachment (379.21, Vitreous degeneration). If an ophthalmologist does not see anything in the routine ophthalmoscopy, he will probably not do an EO.
In the unlikely event that the ophthalmologist doesn’t find any significant problems with the retina after the EO, link 92225 to 379.24 (Disorders of vitreous body; other vitreous opacities). “Vitreous floaters” appears in a note under that code in the ICD-9 manual. If the ophthalmologist does not see floaters, look to the 368.1x series (Subjective visual disturbances).
However: If the ophthalmologist can’t see anything more with an EO than he can see with a routine ophthalmoscopy, defending the use of the EO may be difficult. Some experts recommend not billing for an EO unless there is some abnormality of the retina or vitreous to draw in the report.
© Ophthalmology Coding Alert. Download your 2 FREE sample issues here.
Continue Reading
Pulmonology Coding Challenge: Why Are My 94664 Claims Getting Denied?
Posted on 21. Jan, 2010 by Editor.
Before coding 94664, check off these items.
Question: Under the direction of my pulmonologist I recently submitted 94664 for reimbursement for training time, but the bill was rejected? Can I challenge this?
Answer: You can challenge training denials, provided your documentation supports the education’s reason. However, “not all payers will pay for 94664,” notes Gary N. Gross, MD, executive vice president of the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.
If practices abuse the code, probably fewer payers will pay the approximately $14 national rate.
Solution: To support reporting 94664 (Demonstration and/or evaluation of patient utilization of an aerosol generator, nebulizer, metered dose inhaler or IPPB device), documentation should include an indication of medical necessity, Gross stresses.
The physician should state in the chart’s plan or treatment portion two items: that the patient requires a teaching session on the use of his MDI, discus, nebulizer, etc., and why the session is needed. A statement could read, “The patient did not demonstrate the proper use of his MDI.”
Available on CD: 2010 Update for pulmonology coders. With Jill Young.
Continue Reading
How Do I Code a 2-Sided Nosebleed?
Posted on 19. Jan, 2010 by sanjay.aikat.
Heads up: 2 nosebleed codes are not the answer.
Question: A patient reports to the ED after sustaining injuries during a soccer match; she was hit in the face with a ball, her nose is bleeding, and her right eye is blackened. The physician is not able to stop the bleeding with ice or pressure, so she performs repeated and extensive cautery using a silver nitrate stick on both nostrils. The bleeding relents, and the physician orders an x-ray to ensure that the patient’s nose is not broken.
Results are negative. Notes indicate a level-four E/M. Can I report 30903 x 2, since the physician stopped bleeding in both nostrils? No, you’ll report this under bilateral procedure guidelines. On the claim, report the following:
Answer: No, you’ll report this under bilateral procedure guidelines. On the claim, report the following: (more…)
Continue Reading
Anesthesia Coding Education: Combined Spinal Epidural
Posted on 17. Jan, 2010 by Editor.
Question: Our anesthesiologists sometimes mark our C-section tickets as “combined spinal epidural,” but our billing system will only allow us to choose epidural or spinal. Where can I find information about spinal epidurals and how to correctly code them?
Answer: From a coding perspective, whether your physician used spinal or epidural anesthesia doesn’t matter as long as you report the correct obstetrics code. Base your anesthesia code on the case specifics:
• 01961 (Anesthesia for cesarean deliver only) for a straight c-section instead of converting from labor to a csection
• 01967 (Neuraxial labor analgesia/anesthesia for planned vaginal deliver [this includes any repeat subarachnoid needle placement and drug injection and/or any necessary replacement of an epidural catheter during labor]) for a standard labor and vaginal delivery
• +01968 (Anesthesia for cesarean delivery following neuraxial labor analgesia/anesthesia [List separately in addition to code for primary procedure performed]) for a planned vaginal delivery that changes to a cesarean section.
© Anethesia & Pain Management Coding Alert. Download your 2 FREE sample issues here.
2010 Anesthesia Coding Reference Audio Collection.
Continue Reading
Winter Laceration Repair: How Do I Code For Dermabond?
Posted on 17. Jan, 2010 by sanjay.aikat.
Warning: Your coding will vary depending on who’s getting the claim
Question: A 60-year-old patient reports to the ED with a bandaged left hand. The patient says she was cleaning out the blades of her snow blower and cut her left index finger; the wound is wrapped in gauze, but it is reddening with blood. During an expanded problem focused history and exam, the physician undresses the wound, applies pressure and ice to stop the bleeding, and cleans it using Betadine. During the E/M service, the physician notes a laceration to the index finger but no signs of infection. Using Dermabond, the physician closes a 2.7 cm laceration on the patient’s finger. How should I code this encounter?
Answer… (more…)
Continue Reading
10060 Won’t Wash for Some I&Ds
Posted on 14. Jan, 2010 by Editor.
Careful: A pilonidal cyst I&D is a separate animal.
Question: A patient presents to the ED reporting pain in her spine. During the exam portion of a level-three E/M, the physician discovers that the painful area is red, and slightly warm to the touch. The patient also has a low-grade fever that she says she noticed about two days ago. The physician makes a shallow incision with a scalpel at the base of the patient’s spine and drains the pus from the area. I reported 10060 and received a denial. Why?
Answer: You chose a standard incision and drainage (I&D) code when you should have opted for a pilonidal cyst I&D code. When you re-submit the claim, report the following: (more…)
Continue Reading
How Do I Bill For Follow-Up Visits After the Global?
Posted on 12. Jan, 2010 by Editor.
Tip: Make sure the ICD-9 coding & documentation support follow-up visits after the global.
Question: Code 19101 has a 10-day global period, which means you cannot bill an E/M for anything related to that procedure within that time frame. If the patient continues to have follow-up visits outside the global period, should we then report the appropriate E/M level?
Example: Patient has an open breast biopsy on June 15, so the global period goes through June 25. The patient then has additional follow-up visits on June 26, July 3, and July 10. What is the most appropriate way to bill for the three follow-up visits that the surgeon provides outside the global period? Does modifier 24 apply?
Answer … (more…)
Continue Reading
Radiology Coding Challenge: Why is Medicare Denying a 38792, 78195 Claim
Posted on 10. Jan, 2010 by Editor.
Tip: Discover true meaning of 38792 note
Question: The physician performed a sentinel node injection with lymphoscintigraphy. A note with 38792 states to report 78195 for imaging. So why did Medicare deny a claim that included both codes?
Answer: You should report 78195 (Lymphatic and lymph nodes imaging) for this service and leave 38792 (Injection procedure; for identification of sentinel node) off the claim. The Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits consider 38792 and 78195 to be mutually exclusive.
Helpful: CPT Assistant (December 1999) explains that imaging code 78195 includes the injection: “The injection of radioactive tracer is included in the lymphoscintigraphy procedure performed at the same session and is not reported separately. Therefore, it is inappropriate to report 38792 when lymphoscintigraphy is performed.” (more…)
Continue Reading
Radiology Coding Challenge: Total Spine MRI Without Contrast
Posted on 05. Jan, 2010 by Editor.
Question: Which CPT code should I use for a total spine MRI without contrast?
Answer: You won’t find a single CPT code that describes a “total spine” MRI, but you may report a code for each region the radiologist examines:
• 72141 — Magnetic resonance (e.g., proton) imaging, spinal canal and contents, cervical; without contrast material
• 72146 — Magnetic resonance (e.g., proton) imaging, spinal canal and contents, thoracic; without contrast material
• 72148 — Magnetic resonance (e.g., proton) imaging, spinal canal and contents, lumbar; without contrast material.
Support: Reporting all three spine regions (cervical, thoracic, lumbar) is appropriate when the radiologist performs and interprets an MRI of all three regions, according to the July/August 2003 issue of The ACR’s Radiology Coding Source. The ACR recommends that the radiologist dictate separate reports for each separate region studied.
© Radiology Coding Alert. Download your 2 FREE sample issues here.
Continue Reading
How Do I Code An Arthroscopic To Open Ankle Surgery?
Posted on 04. Jan, 2010 by Editor.
Question: Our surgeon attempted to remove a loose body in the ankle arthroscopically, but it was too large so he had to perform an open removal. Do I bill only for the open procedure, or include the arthroscopic attempt as a discontinued procedure?
Answer: Because your surgeon completed the procedure as an open case, you’ll report only 27620 (Arthrotomy, ankle, with joint exploration, with or without biopsy, with or without removal of loose or foreign body) Include V64.43 (Arthroscopic surgical procedure converted to open procedure) as a secondary diagnosis.
Arthroscopic answer: If the physician had completed the procedure arthroscopically, you would submit 29894 (Arthroscopy, ankle, [tibiotalar and fibulotalar joints], surgical; with removal of loose body or foreign body) instead.
© Orthopedic Coding Alert. Download your 2 FREE sample issues here.
Orthopedic Coders: Do you understand the new consult coding rules? Get clear answers from our 2010 orthopedic coding audio update on January 7th.
Continue Reading
How Do I Code Genetic Counseling By A Physician
Posted on 21. Dec, 2009 by Editor.
Limit 96040 to Trained Counselor
Question: May we report 96040 if our physician is performing genetic counseling?
Answer: You should report 96040 (Medical genetics and genetic counseling services, each 30 minutes face-toface with patient/family) only for a trained genetic counselor’s services. (Currently, the American Board of Genetic Counselors [ABMG] certifies genetic counselors in the US and Canada.) Don’t use 96040 for genetic counseling by a physician or nonphysician who is not a genetic counselor.
Although nothing precludes a physician from also being a genetic counselor, CPT states that if a physician provides genetic counseling to an individual, choose the appropriate E/M code. If the physician counsels a patient without symptoms or an established disease, CPT points you instead to 99401-99402 (Preventive medicine counseling …). (more…)
Continue Reading
Urology Reimbursement: Coding for MESA, TESA
Posted on 17. Dec, 2009 by Editor.
Question: Could you please give me the most current coding guidelines for the MESA and TESA procedures? The last I was aware, we were to use unlisted procedure codes. Is that still correct?
Answer: You should still use unlisted procedure codes to report microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) and testicular sperm aspiration (TESA, sometimes called TESE for testicular sperm extraction).
There are no Category I procedure codes for these procedures. For MESA, however, there is an S code: S4028 (Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration).
Bad news: Unfortunately, not all payers, including Medicare, will pay for S4028. S codes, found in the HCPCS manual, are temporary national codes for which Medicare will not reimburse you. You may typically report S codes to some private payers and Medicaid, but doublecheck the rules for your particular state and payer.
For payers that do not recognize S codes, you should report the unlisted procedure code, 55899 (Unlisted procedure, male genital system), for MESA. You should also use this unlisted code for all payers when reporting TESA/TESE.
Charge the patient: Many payers will not pay for male infertility diagnostic procedures or treatments, including MESA and TESA/TESE diagnostic procedures. Check with the patient’s insurance before the urologist performs the infertility service, and remember to request and obtain precertification from the payer before the procedure. You should also obtain a signed advance beneficiary notice (ABN) from the patient if you expect the payer to deny payment.
Remember: ABNs help patients decide whether they want to proceed with a service even though they may have to pay for it. A signed ABN helps ensure that your office will receive payment directly from the patient if a carrier refuses to pay. Without a valid ABN, you cannot hold a Medicare beneficiary responsible for the denied charges.
© Urology Coding Alert. Download your 2 FREE sample issues here.
Thursday on AUDIO: Dr. Ferragamo’s 2010 Coding & Reimbursement Update.
Continue Reading
Surgical Coding: Scar Revision on Previous Mastectomy Site
Posted on 15. Dec, 2009 by Editor.
Tip: Find mastectomy scar revision in wound repair
Question: Our surgeon performed a scar revision on the site of a previous mastectomy. The procedure involved excising a 16.5 cm curved scar before performing a layered closure. How should we code this?
Answer: You should use complex wound repair codes for the scar revision procedure that you describe. Specifically, you should use the trunk codes 13101 (Repair,complex, trunk; 2.6 cm to 7.5 cm) and +13102 (… each additional 5 cm or less [List separately in addition to code for primary procedure]).
Measure repair: Whether straight, curved, angular, or stellate, the operative report should note the length of the repair. Because your report stated 16.5 cm, you should report 13101 for the first 7.5cm and +13102 x 2 for the additional 9 cm.
You should not code separately for the scar excision. When the surgeon removes the scar, he creates the “defect” that he then repairs. The scar excision plus the layered closure justifies selecting the complex wound repair codes rather than intermediate wound repair.
© General Surgery Coding Alert. Download your 2 FREE sample issues here.
2010 General Surgery Coding Update. An audio class with Terri Brame, MBA, CPC-GENSG, CPC-H, CPC-I.
Continue Reading
Coding Keloid Scar Removal
Posted on 12. Dec, 2009 by Editor.
Watch out: Avoid this unlisted code.
Question: Is removal of a keloid scar considered an unlisted procedure? What is the right code?
Answer: Use 17110 (Destruction [e.g., laser surgery, electrosurgery, cryosurgery, chemosurgery, surgical curettement], of benign lesions other than skin tags or cutaneous vascular lesions; up to 14 lesions) with diagnosis 701.4 (Keloid scar). 17110 and 7111 (… 15 or more lesions) are now used for destruction of common or plantar warts.
Rewind: In 2007, these codes were revised to include destruction of benign lesions other than skin tags or cutaneous vascular lesions. (more…)

